Fact Checking Trump

Trump’s Fact Check Strategy

1. Media covers up stories and lies about events, attempts to shift the conversation somewhere else
2. Trump makes statements about events the media is hiding, factuality doesn’t really matter
3. Media writes ‘fact check’ articles, where they must talk about the things they have been hiding in order to ‘fact check’ it
4. Those under the control of the Media are exposed to facts and stories that would otherwise have been suppressed, with some of them being smart enough to be suspicious.
   
5. Angry anti-Trump people do Trumps work for him by widely disseminating the ‘fact check’ articles which disclose topics and events that the media would rather not be disclosed, working against their own interests and for Trump by exposing uncomfortable stories.

For example, look at this article from ABC, which attempts to fact check his recent speech.  I linked it, because I want to reward them for writing this type of article with clicks. In bold, we see the following statements:

“Clinton’s Email Was Hacked” [FALSE]

“Clinton Will Create Open Borders” [FALSE]

Clinton’s Bosnia Story Was “Phony” [TRUE]

“We Are the Highest Taxed Nation in the World” [FALSE]

“Clinton Wants to Let in 550 Percent More Refugees” [TRUE]

Hundreds of Recent Immigrants Are “Convicted” Terrorists [FALSE]

It doesn’t matter if the article rates the topics as false. The fact that ABC that has an article saying “Clinton Will Create Open Borders” (in bold) is amazing.

Do you suppose that either the Clintons or the MSM want to be talking about Open Borders? Or Bosnia? Or refugees? Or immigrant crime and terrorism? Hell no! They want to be talking about white privilege and gay rights and evil racists and bigots. But what are they talking about? Open Borders. It’s pure memetic genius.

Trump can put them on the defensive whenever he wants, then they carry water for him by printing articles discussing whether or not “Clinton Wants to Let in 550 Percent More Refugees“. Then what are we talking about? Refugees! Expect more of this. Oh, and please encourage any and all to angrily re-post these fact check articles which make them think about issues that the MSM desperately wants to hide. This allows us to cheaply and surreptitiously inject our memes into the political discourse.

You should also try this technique personally. On a message board, post an incorrect hatefact such as “93% of Syrian refugees can’t read or write in their native language”. Now, this is vague and incorrect. Are we talking about refugees to Europe, or where exactly. The percentages I have seen are about 65%, though some places have articles with low figures like 30%. It doesn’t matter. What matters is some smart opponent will not be able to help himself, he’s going to take the bait: he’s going to have to correct you. Then you can have a discussion about exactly how uneducated ‘refugees’ are. Now the focus is on immigrants and refugees. Hopefully, you can get him to agree that you are retarded and the percentage is not 93%, but only 65% of Syrian refugees who can’t read or write in their native language.

I can think of a few more false hatefacts to get the ball rolling:

• Blacks make up 12% of the population but commit 77% of all murders
• Blacks rape 337,000 white women per year on average

Use either of the above, then post a link to FBI stats and force them to do the math and correct you.

Happy fishing!

Wedging Gays and Muslims

We are winning the meme wars. This is a ground game and it requires all of us to pull together to capture the idea-space of the normies. We make and distribute the memes that define the reality of the normies. The internet has allowed us to capture this territory from the mainstream media, but we must fight on a daily basis to maintain control of this crucial battlefield. This memespace is the territory that the ‘conservatives’ failed to hold. We have taken it and we must hold it. We will hold it. We were Born to Meme.

The big topic this week is the mass killings of gays at a gay bar in Orlando this weekend. The shooter was a Muslim who called 911 and pledged allegiance to ISIS. This was unmistakably Islamic violence against gays in America.

Watch this clip as Owen Jones walks off set because of his rage at his liberal co-hosts who refuse to admit that 1) Gays were the targets, 2) that a Muslim killed them for being gay.

His co-hosts try to make this out to be a ‘lone lunatic’ who had guns that need to be banned, attempting to deflect to gun control and mental illness, rather than admit what this gay man just realized: Gays will never be safe from Muslim violence, and the liberals will allow Muslim violence against gays because Muslims are higher ranked on the Progressive stack than gays.

 

The problem for the LGBT community is that this shooting highlights the Progressive stack ranking values of two Democrat client groups: Muslims and LGBT.

People like Hillary are in the position that they must loudly wail and gnash their teeth about violence to LGBT at the same time that they can’t say the word Muslim. It causes them a lot of pain when anyone points out that Islam (and Muslim) is extremely anti-gay (tons of poll data and videos and koran quotes available). So, they deflect. They want to talk about anything else: gun control, Christians, colonialism… anything that keeps the hatred of the Left focused on the target: straight, white, males.

The reaction of the Left is calculated for one thing: maintain the coalition. They don’t care what the truth is, they will tell any lie which allows them to maintain their voting coalition. They don’t care that Islam is 100% antithetical to Western values, and that Muslims will never peacefully co-exist with gays. The problem is that gays just realized that they are temporarily useful to the Democrats, and only temporarily, and that the Democrats have zero intention of actually protecting them from Muslim violence. Gays are valuable to help attack straight white men, but in the end they have a lower rank on the Progressive stack than brown Muslims.

The Democrats are pro-Islam and, objectively, to be pro-Islam is to be anti-Gay.

This makes this shooting a very valuable wedge issue. By allowing Muslims into America, the Democrats are in effect choosing Muslims over gays. We simply need to hammer this issue. Meme magic is real boys, so spread this meme. Drive this wedge. Smash their coalition. Make it cool to be anti-Muslim because Liberalism.

Donald Trump has already begun this strategy with his speech in New Hampsire, 23:45.

“Why would we admit people who support violent hatred. Hillary Clinton can never claim to be a friend of the gay community as long as she continues to support immigration policies that bring Islamic extremists to our country and who suppress women, gays and anyone else who doesn’t share their views or values.

She can’t have it both ways. She can’t claim to be supportive of these communities while trying to increase the number of people coming in who want to oppress these same communities. How does this kind of immigration make our lives better? How does this kind of immigration make our country better? Why does Hillary Clinton want to bring people in, in vast numbers, who reject our values? Why? Explain.

Ask yourself who is really the friend of women, and the LGBT community, Donald Trump, with actions, or Hillary Clinton, with her words? I will tell you, who the better friend is, and some day I believe that will be proven out.”

Last summer, after the Supreme Court ruling, the White House was lit up in rainbow flag colors. It is currently very chic to be pro-Gay, and many normal people innately understand that they have a lot to fear from Islam. All they need is an excuse, and the Orlando shootings are the excuse they need to become supporters of ending Muslim immigration, of rooting out Muslim terrorists on America soil, and of suspending immigration completely for a time.

To exploit this sentiment, we are currently driving this wedge as deeply as possible to break off the pro-Gay coalition into the Trump camp. I personally have been using the following images, and I encourage you to use them as you spread this meme to normies:

1. To be pro-Islam is to be anti-Gay. Hillary and the Dems are pro-Islam.
2. Daddy’s gonna build a wall and keep you safe.

This is how I’m using it on Faceberg.

Then, when liberals attempt to deflect away from the wedge, they are handled thusly:

Similarly, to be pro-Second-Amendment is to be pro-Gay:

Go get ’em, boys.

 

 

Meme Magic: Echoes and Coincidence

Well, the (((Echoes))) and Coincidence Detector appeared in the minds of SJW normies this week. Their heads exploded. We laughed. All in all it’s been a great week in meming for the AltRight.

Echoes? (((Echoes))) are a visual pun. On The Daily Shoah podcast, there’s a spot called the Merchant Minute which is pure Jewish mockery by a memetic genius whose name I can say but can’t spell, [More Rock You]. Ex Dee Dee Dee. The Spergalicious song on this MM is particularly funny to me. You can hear the echo on (((Steven Spielburg))) at about 0m 55s.

Well, this gag took off and became a running gag on the show. So then online, listeners began using the gag in posts, which was translated to the visual (((echoes))).

Next came the Coincidence Detector. It’s a Chrome extension that puts echoes around (((Jewish))) names, and replaces ‘Israel’ with ‘Our greatest ally’. It was just a little toy that some of the boys made for laughs to keep the echoes gag going.

Then mic.com found out about it. They ‘broke’ the story and a succession of click-bait-loving horrified normies copypasta’d it all over the internet, including a lot of influential sites like Fortune, Washington Post, Haaretz, Forward, the Times of Israel, The Daily Beast and Engadget. Hilarity ensued.

Mic.com: “Coincidence Detector”: The Google Chrome Extension White Supremacists Use to Track Jews

Fortune Magazine: Google Removes a Chrome Extension That Identified and Tracked Jews

Of course, all the sources do the usual pointing and shrieking and screaming “Nazi!” and “Racist”, blah, blah, blah. Just your typical day on the AltRight really. Except on a worldwide scale. This is actually great for the AltRight. In order to attack us, they have to talk about us. When they talk about us, people are exposed to our memes. When people are exposed to our memes, they are polarized: either they become enemies or they become allies. And a lot of people are becoming allies. Why? Because we’re right.

As usual, the mainstream has no idea what is happening. It’s like them reporting Sam Hyde as the latest mass shooter every week. The most hilarious cluelessness comes from attn.com. I won’t give it all away, but if you’re in the know, you’ll want to see this.

Of course the Coincidence Detector is not used to ‘track jews’. Why would we need that. We already know who they are. They wear it on their sleeves. I have developed my own personal Coincidence Detector. For example, earlier this week I read an article entitled There’s No Such Thing as Racism Against White People. The author writes:

This is a recognised tactic from opponents of multiculturalism, or from those who feel their position of dominance in society is being challenged. Why should we be able to say what we like about white Britons, but we can’t say the same thing about black people, or Jews, or Eastern Europeans?

That’s because we – white Britons, that is – are not, and haven’t been, often systematically, denied opportunity. We rule the country. Politics is overwhelmingly white, big business likewise, and the media is almost exclusively white.

Note how this nice white man, Simon Kelner, is lecturing us about white racism and how people can’t say not-nice things about Jews, but they can about whites. Of course we can trust Simon Kelner’s wisdom because he is speaking for “we – white Britons“, he is saying that we white people deserve this double standard, this treatment, because the others are systematically denied opportunity, which we can read between the lines to assume is caused by white racism, why else would whites need to be punished and mistreated?

So, here we have a white man calling for the mistreatment of white people. That seems odd doesn’t it? Except, I have seen this pattern of behavior before, from Jews. I’ve seen Jon Stewart berate whites and intone how ‘we’ must do better. Wouldn’t it be a coincidence if Simon Kelner was a Jew? It sure would be. So, a quick internet search and seconds later my suspicion is confirmed. Yep, another Jew berating white people about how white people need to accept white displacement, all without notifying the reader that he is actually a Jew.

Why does it matter? Because ethnicity isn’t just genetics, it is tribal and cultural affiliation. Whites have a tribal and cultural affiliation with each other, and Jews have a tribal and cultural affiliation with Jews. Are Jews of European heritage and descent genetically? Yes, I believe they are. Do Jews see themselves as white? No, I believe that their distinct ethnic affiliation prevents them seeing themselves as white. Therefore, those Jews who see themselves as distinct from whites cannot also be white.

We see this ploy over and over again. Jews pretending to be members of the white tribe, shilling for multiculturalism. Shilling for communism. Shilling for globalism. Over and over and over, until we develop a Coincidence Detector. No, we don’t need a Chrome extension to know who is a Jew. All we need to do is spot their patterns of behavior and do a quick internet search to confirm it.

Nor does the AltRight need a Chrome extension to detect who is an enemy and heap scorn and mockery upon them. But it makes us laugh.

Why do we put echoes on Jewish names? Because of this game that Simon Kelner is playing. Pretending to be white while being a fifth column to push policies which are adverse to the interest of whites. You see, this tactic is a deception. It’s not an honest attempt to argue for the policies which Kelner desires as a Jew. It’s an attempt to whisper in the ears of whites as a concerned friend, offering avuncular advice. Jews and only Jews play this game. This method of working against our interest through deception is absolutely a source of ire from the AltRight. Here’s an idea: Why don’t the Jews simply present their positions fairly and not attempt to deceive?

Why do Jews think it’s called the Coincidence Detector? Could it possibly be because we keep finding them acting as a fifth column and deceptively pretending to offer advice and guidance to whites, while working together as a group against our interests? Could it be that it’s just a coincidence that so often we find Jews playing this role, without divulging their distinct and incompatible interests?

We are tired of this deceptive behavior from Jews. We are tired of this deceptive behavior from Jews in the media, in academia and in business. We are at war for the survival of our people and we see you operating as a fifth column. Are your feelings hurt because we put some echoes on your name? Sorry, not sorry. Quit undermining the national sovereignty of whites in white countries and maybe whites will quit ejecting you from their countries for being traitors.

All of the media presents the AltRight as mad dog Nazi Jew-Haters, driven by an irrational hate for Jews. But none of them will explain to you why we name the Jew. Why we heap scorn and mockery on those Jews that perpetrate this deception. I’m not sure why that could be. Maybe it’s just a coincidence that they all leave out that part of the story.

To be fair, I’m not sure that this Mark Kogan is  the same one who is a contributor to mic.com, but wouldn’t that be a coincidence?

 

Note: Additional Images

---

Addendum: 2017

Hello Fellow White Man: Whites Against Trump

 

Jewish Daily Forward Article:
Anti-Semitism in America is Nothing New. Don’t Deny Jewish History and Culture by Calling Us “White”

http://archive.is/pYyZD

Relevant screen cap:

---

Meme Tactic: Hot Trump Supporters

Let’s face it, Bernie and Hillary have a terrible branding problem: their supporters are just not attractive. Have you seen Hillary supporters? Lena Dunham is a perfect example. Yuck.

On the other hand, beautiful women love Trump and masculine men want to be Trump. I’ve even seen some predictions of a Trump-inspired baby-boom, which is certainly possible.

As I’ve said before, I spend some of my time in the Trenches meming things into reality. And a Trump presidency is one of those things. I’ve also been learning from Vox Day about the difference between rhetoric and dialectic. When someone attacks Trump with some nonsense charge, a dialectician will attempt to counter with a logical argument, facts and reason. However, humans are rarely persuaded by dialectic. Humans are persuaded by rhetoric. So, I have a new kill shot for those who attack Trump. I post a picture like this:

Because Hillary and Bernie supporters are cat-ladies and low-T bronies, they are unattractive, so they have no response. Images like these arouse normal males to want the girl that supports Trump. It’s just animal instinct. Women want to be like the women that men want, so they want to be this girl. This is rhetoric in action. No words, just a picture of a hot Trump supporter. Luckily, there are millions of hot Trump supporters.

It’s a kill shot.

“If do right, no can defense” — Mr. Miyagi

Here’s a treasure trove of Trump supporter hotness.

Happy hunting! Meme America Great Again!

 

PS – Similarly, I am responding to anti-gun threads and memes with images like this:

Blackwashed

Google has made an update to it’s image algorithms, blackwashing image results. I officially hate Google more than Facebook now. This level of gaslighting will draw fire, and will alienate millions of white people who discover the manipulation.

I did these searches myself, and these results are real.

 

Tactical Freudianism

A form of sophistry is to reduce all opposing viewpoints to hate or fear. I call this Tactical Freudianism.

Tactical Freudianism: the psychopathologization of the mental state or motivation of an opponent.

I see Tactical Freudianism as a variety of ad hominem, where rather than attack the argument, you simply label the opponent’s psychology as pathological. Just is an ad hominem is a label applied to ‘the man’ rather than the argument, Tactical Freudianism is a label applied to the psychological state or motivations of the arguer. In the scale of sophistry, Tactical Freudianism is a step above the basic-bitch tactic of calling your opponent a racist or a fascist. It’s still nothing more than sophistry.

Tactical Freudianism incorporates elements of gaslighting, where you attempt to convince someone that their sane judgement is actually mad. To label an argument as hate or fear or x-phobia, is to provide false information with the purpose of making the opponent doubt his own memory, perception or sanity.

Those who understand that Muslims are a clear and present danger to the West are Islamophobes. They are gaslighted into believing that their perception of the danger of Muslim invasion is due to faulty memory, perception or sanity.

We see this tactic applied widely, in all mediums. Tactical Freudianism. Call it when you see it.

---

Note @Outsideness sent me a tweet reminding me of Adorno, with a link to this Wiki page. Excellent addition.

MOTW: Teh Centipede #REKT

This is about a category of memes. Maybe we should call them the OOSHTBHFAM or #REKT videos. They capture and celebrate moments of sheer shitlordy brilliance. We play them for each other and high five and generally cackle and act like the big monkeys we are. It’s fun. You should try it.

These videos use real footage of shitlording feats of strength and are overlayed with images, video, sound effects (airhorns), and music (airhorn music). The overlays are often pop culture references to gangsta rappers, consumer products, pro-wrestling.

This video get responses like this from my crew:

 

The most prolific and best examples that I know of are the You Can’t Stump the Trump videos. [Centipede! Wow!]

In this line there are now You Can’t Stump the Milo and You Can’t Stump the Gavin videos.

Here is an archetypal example, about Milo:

 

A hilarious one where Gavin destroys an SJW Feminist:

 

I hope to see more of these videos. This is memetic warfare. Get busy, guise!

MOTW: Murdoch Shills

I think I missed last week’s Meme of The Week, so I’m catching up. (You guys know I’m not actually gonna keep track of this meme schedule, right?)

In case you missed it, on the internet you can write ICYMI and people know what you mean. In any case, last week or so my favorite alt-right memologists kicked the hornets nest in an episode that “>gasses Dr. Pierce and not Milo Kikopolous”. That was The Murdoch Diaries, which I thought was  brilliant and which I shared widely.

The Stormfags bristled and let Murdoch know that “they done goofed.” After the dust up, Murdoch posted this comment under Diaries:

Murdoch Murdoch1 week ago

It’s 11:36 am and I’m drinking bourbon because fuck it. We discussed whether or not to say anything and we agreed not to, but I’m drunk and fuck it. Ok so apparently the message didn’t translate the way that I wanted it to. It wasn’t an attack on stormfront, more like a poke. The episode is about the “alt-right” and the individuals who dwell within it. Each character represented a different facet. Murdoch was the weeb who probably stumbled into /pol/ through /a/ and /r9k/. Murdoch Chan represented the straight up Nat Soc on the extreme end. Dr Murdoch is the neo reactionary who stands somewhere in the middle. We used Pierce because he represented the more extreme version of the movement and naturally the weeb was most at odds with him. We killed him in the end because I DON’T think violence will help us in our cause. Look what just happened in Chicago. Those niggers won Trump the election (i hope) by acting like…well niggers. I know that nearly every revolution requires violence and that innocent people die in all wars, but we must claim the moral high ground if we are to win over the hearts and minds of the people. That cause, at least for me, is saving Europa. I don’t want to see every white homeland overrun by non-europeans. I don’t think Pierce was a fool, but I think using his methods, today, would prevent gaining more allies to our cause. My intention wasn’t to shit on Pierce, but I see why people would take it that way. I mean we did kind of gas him but I thought most of you would understand it’s a joke. He was fighting marxism before this movement was even in its infancy. We used Milo and Lauren Southern because they already have large followings of people who may or may not know “IT’S THE KIKES”, which is why we never fully glorified them. Dr. Murdoch calls out Lauren as a Jew and repeatably calls Milo a degenerate faggot. But we need them because normies will not listen to people like Pierce. I think it’s pretty funny that people are calling us shills when we have named the jew in like every other episode lol. I’m surprised people thought we were promoting race mixing when the Hapa was discouraging it. She explained why it was wrong and why it sucks to have a split identity between different races. At the same time though, what else would you expect from a weeb? I love you guys, that includes stormers, race realists, faggots, happas, and anyone else that is willing to fight and die against globalism and the death of Europa/the West. All I want to do is unite all of you under 1 banner because it will take all of us working together to do what must be done. Feelsbadman when I realize all I did was create a divide, but this has inspired the next video.

-Murdoch

 

You fucking faggots are still worth losing friends for.

-Murdoch Chan

Well, the Murdoch’s seem to have weathered their existential crisis with their sense of humor none the worse for wear. Because their latest episode “Shills” is, once again, nothing short of the most god-like and dankest memes on the InterWebs. Murdoch went meta on the alt-right’s internal dilemmas. I laughed. It made me feel something.

 

(BTW: When are we going to get a damned right-wing Patreon? We’ve got to figure this one out, goys. How else are we going to fund the dankest of memes?)

 

You fucking faggots need to watch this shit.

 

Who cares who was here first?

This memes popped up on my InterWebs today: Europeans were in North America before the Asians. Now, to be clear, I find this interesting (if it is true), but I think this is a loser in the battle for the meme-o-sphere.

 [Full size images are at the bottom.]

It’s not so much the content of the meme that matters to me here, but I want to express a thought about framing. This meme is a loser, because it has already lost the frame.

The meme is attempting to counter the narrative that the noble savages we call American Indians were in North America and then the evil white man came and conquered them and genocided them and stole their lands with shiny beads. In this typically Leftist narrative, weakness and savagery are good, and strength and civilization are bad. That is the frame.

However, the counter-argument this meme uses is “we were here first”, therefore it was actually the Asians who genocided the Europeans. The mistake is that it accepts the frame that weakness is good and strength is bad, and tries to portray Europeans as the weak (and therefore good) victims. The memeologist thought they were countering the Leftist narrative, but instead they played right into it. Needless to say, playing into the enemy’s frame is a losing strategem.

Instead, break out of the frame. State the obvious: Strength is good. Winning is good. The Darwinian struggle is real and it is never-ending. Let me put on my bowtie and fedora for a moment: Yes, now distinct peoples can trade with each other and everyone can benefit from this trade, but we don’t have to live together. And if we come into competition, then Europeans are going to win, and winning is good.

This little meme below breaks the frame and re-frames the discussion with a powerful message, one that is powerful because it is true: strength is good. Don’t fall into the Leftist frame. Don’t try to argue that Trump (or anyone else) is not a racist. Argue that strength is good. Argue that solidarity is good because it makes a group strong. Survival is good. Argue that the Darwinian struggle is not going to end. The Leftist argument (that being a weak victim is moral) is a lie. They are attempting to frame morality in such a way that Europeans owe them something. They are attempting to use this lie and this frame to get access to our resources at a discount — they are attempting to steal. We have no incentive to accept that weakness is good and every incentive to assert that strength is good, because we are strong and that is Nature’s way. Never try to frame us as weak and therefore deserving, the weak deserve nothing. Nature does not reward the weak. That’s the truth and the truth is enough.

---

 

MOTW: Murdoch on Trudeau

Channels like Murdoch Murdoch‘s are the South Park of the Alt-Right. I check in on this channel regularly, and find his work funny and clever. His latest takedown of Justin Trudeau is particularly brutal and hilarious: Trudeau’s Diversityathon.

 

And if you haven’t seen it, be sure to check out Episode 1: The reddit cuck discovers /pol/.