Marginalization as Obscurantism

The pseudoscientists use the words ‘marginalization’ and ‘marginalization’. From Social Exclusion (on the SJW Encyclopedia):

Social exclusion, or social marginalization, is the social disadvantage and relegation to the fringe of society. It is a term used widely in Europe and was first used in France.[1] It is used across disciplines including education, sociology, psychology, politics and economics.

Social exclusion is the process in which individuals or entire communities of people are systematically blocked from (or denied full access to) various rights, opportunities and resources that are normally available to members of a different group, and which are fundamental to social integration within that particular group[2] (e.g., housing, employment, healthcare, civic engagement, democratic participation, and due process).

Alienation or disenfranchisement resulting from social exclusion can be connected to a person’s social class, race, skin color, educational status, childhood relationships,[3]living standards, or personal choices in fashion. Such exclusionary forms of discrimination may also apply to people with a disability, minorities, LGBT people, drug users,[4] institutional care leavers,[5] the elderly and the young. Anyone who appears to deviate in any way from perceived norms of a population may thereby become subject to coarse or subtle forms of social exclusion.

The outcome of social exclusion is that affected individuals or communities are prevented from participating fully in the economic, social, and political life of the society in which they live.[6]

Marginalization is an overloaded term used by social pseudoscientists to frame the group under discussion as victims. Marginalization is a process that is performed upon someone. This brings up the concept of agency: the argument is that victim classes lack agency (the ability to act). Marginalization is such a term that removes agency from the groups under discussion. This is the loading. If the victim class lacks agency, then logically it follows that there are agents acting upon the class (the victimizers). Marginalization is defined by the social pseudoscientists as a form of victimization or oppression, which is the process of an agent acting upon those who lack agency.

These loaded terms: oppression, victimization, marginalization are obscurantist techniques: they are an attempt to hide something? But what?


Humans can be roughly divided into classes. We build social hierarchies based on these classes. Class or caste is a common feature of many societies today, but in the West there was a reaction to aristocracy. The middle and lower classes murdered their upper classes (the aristocracy) and then attempted justify this murder with a lie: the denial of the existence of class.

Marxist theory contains an attack on class and advocates re-organization of every aspect of culture and society to remove any differences and achieve the Utopian Classless Society. The Founding Fathers sought to create a form related to a classless society, a middle class society. This was the American project: building a new country on a new continent out of only the middle class and higher. In the New World, more than a 1/3 of the newcomers returned home to Europe, they were the lower classes who could not produce on their own. The Aristocracy of the Old World sought to reduce the numbers of the lower class through selective breeding. This was achieved through manorialism, where only those capable of production (the middle class and above) were granted land, which was essentially equivalent to being granted breeding rights.

The Marxists attempt to achieve their goal by lying: there are no classes. The Founders attempted to achieve their goals through a combination of lying and incentive: all men are created equal and no welfare for layabouts. The Aristocracy attempted to achieve their goals through a combination of lying and incentive: we have the divine right to rule and these are our rules.

Quick Note on All Men Are Created Equal

Keep in mind that the Founders were reacting against Rule of Man (autarchy)(discretionary rule). What they sought was Rule of Law. Any system lacking universal standing, meaning fair and rules based treatment under law, which instead has discretionary rule for some and law for others, then that system cannot be called Rule of Law. For RoL to exist, then all members must be given treatment based on institutionalized rules (law). I believe the phrase ‘all men are created equal’ is an attempt to justify universal standing using religio-moral language, because the Founders at the time lacked the ability to articulate universal standing and its fundamental necessity for the creation of institutionalized order: Rule of Law.

Stop Lying About Class

It’s time to end the lies about class. Classes exist. We have the science. We can measure IQ, which is a rough approximate of class. All men are not created equal: We can create rule of law without lying. The Utopian classless society is an unachievable dream.

Rough Table of Classes (Curt Doolittle’s)

140’s revolutionize INTELLECTUAL (Professors)
130’s synthesize and communicate UPPER (CEO’s etc)
120’s solve and design UPPER MIDDLE (engineers, scientists)
110’s calculate and organize MIDDLE CLASS (white collar workers)
100’s interpret repair and operate (lower middle upper working managerial clsss)
90’s operate, report, but not repair.( midddle working class)
80’s operate (middle working class)
70’s dig ditches and clean. (lower class)

<70 = underclass

The lower and underclass are not ‘marginalized’. They have not been victimized. They have not been oppressed. They are not lacking agency and been acted upon to be placed into a lower position. They were born as lower and underclass.

There are no ‘marginalized peoples’. There are only those classes who cannot function within the system of production and which must be addressed in some way in order to make a functional society.

There is no ‘systematic blocking of access to rights and opportunities’, there is a biological inability on the part of the lower classes to participate meaningfully in the system of production.

Ending The Game

Of course, the end goal of the use of social pseudoscience is always the same: parasitism. To use words to extract resources from society at a discount (it beats working for a living). It doesn’t have to be this way. We can recognize the existence of class and then deal with it. There is no shame in being born in the lower classes, just as there is no shame being born in the upper classes.

The Founders and the Aristocracy were on the right track: the goal is to create a society made up of middle and upper classes (minimizing the lower class components through incremental suppression). This is the upward development of the species. This is true progress: increasing the genetic capital of a population through selective breeding. This is the domestication of man. It is self-directed evolution. It is transcendence. (Note: this strategy is available to all the peoples of the world. Africans and Arabs have just as much genetic potential as the Northern peoples.)

It’s time to be honest. The strategy of the West is that of transcendence. The average Western high IQ is the result of self-directed evolution, of the suppression of the breeding of the lower classes. The strategy of the modern ‘progressives’ is inverted, where the result is to suppress the breeding of the middle and upper classes, to redistribute their wealth to the lower classes, and to import millions of lower classes for short term political gain. This is a suicidal stratagem, and one that the men of the West have every incentive to prevent, by any means necessary. This is the crux of the current political turmoil, as millions of Westerns begin to intuitively grasp the situation. The modern progressive strategy will have the result of devolving the West back into savagery, and could potentially devolve it into a new Dark Age. Europe was on the cusp of an industrial revolution when the last Dark Age overtook it. It took a thousand years to recuperate. A new Dark Age is not beyond the realm of possibility.


DR3 (Dems R Real Racists)

aka “The soft bigotry of low expectations”

This is the realization that Democrat politicians accept the existence of lower classes, which is de facto acceptance of race realism/HBD, and they actively exploit the lower classes for votes, while giving lip service to equality. Republican politicians actively reject the existence of the lower classes, attempting to force the lower classes to behave like the middle class. On the Republican side, this is an idealistic denial of HBD, and the reality of races and that various groups have classes in varying proportion. Africans currently have a larger underclass than whites, the Democrats realize this and exploit this condition for political power.

The Republicans notice this ‘racist’ behavior of the Democrats and cry foul: ‘dems r real racists!’. In truth, the Democrats are actually being more realistic (about race and classes) than the Republicans, who blindly pursue their Utopian Christian Marxist classless brotherhood-of-man society. In essence, the charge of ‘dems r real racists’ is a charge that the Democrats are not holding to the faith of Marxism and the classless society that he envisioned.

The idea that DR3 is a ‘conservative’ argument, made by ‘true conservatives’, is laughable. It’s in essence, the purest Marxian Utopianism. It is an attempt to hold the Democrats to the ‘true Marxist’ vision of a classless society, which the Republicans already hold. Complaining that “we can’t get to the classless society because the Democrats are in effect exploiting the class structure”, is really simply blaming the Democrats for not plugging their eyes and ears like the Republicans and chanting the mantra “All men are created equal! All men are created equal! All men are created equal!” As they chant, the Republicans will continue to slide off the cliff into political irrelevancy, all the while telling themselves that they are the ‘real good guys’.

The solution is for the Republicans to grow up. Quit being idealistic children. Simply tell the truth and drop the pretense of equality. Recognize and accept class differences and national differences and civilizational differences. Recognize and accept being called ‘racist’ by the Democrats who already accept these class differences (the irony) and build workable solutions. Be pragmatic. Exploit the realities of the battlefield.

You know: take your own side. Win.

A wise man once said “We never win anymore”. Saying stupid thinks like ‘DR3’ is a big reason why.

Hatefacts: Gay Culture

Used in a Facebook troll. This is a concern troll, where I point out how gay culture is bad for gay men.

I personally frown on male homosexuality because of the degenerate culture that surrounds it, which leads to such negative outcomes for the men in that culture. So, you could say that I don’t so much frown on homosexuality as a sexual inclination, but on homosexuality as a culture — due to the spread of HIV by gay men, the dangerous promiscuity of gay men, the high drug use of gay men and the high suicide rate of gay men.

  • New HIV infections are on the rise in America due to the ‘destigmatization’ of HIV, with the greatest increase among the youngest group. See CDC.

  • Bell/Weinberg study: 83% of the homosexual men surveyed estimated they had had sex with 50 or more partners in their lifetime, 43% estimated they had sex with 500 or more partners; 28% with 1,000 or more partners.

  • Crime Survey for England & Wales found that drug use in the past year amongst gay and bisexual men is three times higher (33%) than use amongst heterosexual men (11.1%). For lesbian and bisexual women use is more than four times as high (22.9%) than for heterosexual women (5.1%).

  • UCSF researchers have found that twelve percent of urban gay and bisexual men have attempted suicide in their lifetime, a rate three times higher than the overall rate for American adult males.

This post got a lot of quick responses which revolved around blaming straight people for gay culture:

Maybe the suicide rate is high because of people making life difficult for them due to social stigmas around being gay. You can’t say committing suicide is as a result of degenerative behaviour , or is in itself such behaviour.


Yes it is very insidious to use the suicide rate of homosexual people against homosexual people. Of course the suicide rate is going to be higher for homosexuals than that of heterosexuals. Heterosexual people don’t experience homophobia

There is no data showing that straights cause gay dysfunction. So, a fellow troll responded with:

“Heterosexual people don’t experience homophobia”

There’s a big hole in your theory.

In places like San Fransisco which have very high numbers of gays, the social outcomes remain persistently negative.

This falsifies your theory they’re killing themselves because of negative social pressure.

I thought this was a well reasoned response and I plan to use it in the future. Generally though, responses are just more opportunities to spew more hatefacts. Believe it or not, normal people see these numbers and realize that there is a problem with gay culture. I have had extended debates about the rise in HIV and these SJWs will defend gay culture. This is great because normal people see these SJWs defending the spread of HIV and get disgusted with the SJWs. Every thread is a chance to drop some redpills.

Pro Tip: Your troll posts become more accessible to normies if you make some common spelling mistakes.

Have fun!

Memetic Warfare

I am a memetic warrior. Another way to say memetic warrior is troll. I go into public spaces (on the internet) and I say things which are out of fashion, but are true (using a sock account). We call these inconvenient truths hatefacts. I’ve decided to create a collection of hatefacts that others can use. You can find them under the hatefacts category.

I have been spending a lot less time writing and analyzing and a lot more time trolling. Why troll? Simply put: Culture is upstream of politics. Or: control the mind, control the body, control the culture, control the polity. Thought precedes action.

We live in momentous times, and things are changing rapidly because we can now use the internet to inject our memes into the culture, and by so doing we change the culture. Dry theory has it’s place. Who cares how many angels can dance on the head of a pin? Not me. Not any more. This is war and we have the truth on our side, so we need to pound the digital pavement and inject our memes. I will post interesting memes under the memes category. All your memes are belong to us! Happy trolling.