NRx vs AltRight: What now?

The AltRight term received a lot of attention recently thanks to a US presidential candidate targeting it in a speech. This has given a lot of air to the movement, further accelerating its capture of the right. As the New Right captures hearts and minds, the AltRight will drop the Alt and simply become the Right.

NRx has received some recognition in the past few years, as part of the Dark Enlightenment. But its effects have been far outstripped by the AltRight. And that’s OK, because of the division of labor of cognition. They play separate, but related, roles.

Humans exist in classes which are formed on a biological basis, and which are most easily divided by IQ, though this is nothing more than a convenient marker. At the bottom of this post I have provided Curt’s original post and my slightly modified version of it. This is a table of the various classes of the New Right. I think it would be valuable to further complete this mapping of the members of the various classes because we need each class to repackage and present the same message in terms that their class can interpret. We also need to create hierarchical linkages in order to move the messages downstream effectively and spread them throughout the Right.

NRx is Middle Class

According to Curt’s table, NRx is middle class. Some might take offense and argue that it is upper-middle class. Sure, the leaders of NRx are likely upper-middle class, but the average NRxer is solidly middle class. Software engineering is a middle class profession. People who run teams of middle class professionals are upper-middle class (CTOs, CIOs, CEOs, Directors, etc). The middle class is not a salary range: it is an ability range. The middle class are those who have the ability to engage in the system of production. This is why the middle class seeks liberty: because given freedom to choose their means of production, they will choose and perform, because they can. As an aside, this is why working classes are less interested in liberty, because they simply can’t capitalize on it within the system of production to nearly the level of the middle class. And the lower and under classes have zero interest in liberty, because they are completely unable to capitalize within the system of production; they desire security, not liberty (and that’s what self-interested politicians trade them in return for votes).

We can argue about the parameters of classes, and we should. We should define them. We need to understand their roles and to define the behaviors that makes one a ‘good’ member of any class, because these behaviors and actors do exist in every class. We just need to incentivize them properly, which is why we must define and understand them.

The middle class has certain behaviors which make them middle class. They follow norms of propriety. I was right when I wrote that NRx is Right Brahmin Signalling. From the SJW encyclopedia: “Brahmin is a varna (caste) in Hinduism specialising as priests, teachers (acharya) and protectors of sacred learning across generations”. NRx is a group of teachers and priests, solidly middle class and exhibiting middle class mores and norms, such as the prohibition on ridicule, mockery, libel and slander.

AltRight is Working Class

The working classes do not share the middle class values and prohibitions on ridicule, mockery, libel and slander. I have seen very clearly the revulsion of NRx to the coarse meming of the AltRight. The NRx aspersions about ‘populism’ of the AltRight. This is simply the middle class reaction to working class norms.

The thing is: the middle class needs the working class. They will do the jobs that the middle class just won’t do. Say, for example, openly attack with vitriolic hostility the enemies of Western Civilization using Pepe and Le Happy Merchant memes. Or say, engage in ‘high energy’ physical activities which raise the cost of the status quo on the controlling elite. Once the cost of the status quo is high enough, then that controlling elite will accede to the demands of the Right. Who will formulate these demands? Ultimately, the aristocratic class will, with large input from the scholarly classes. Who will implement these demands at the local levels? Obviously, the people who organize all production, the middle class, under the direction of the upper middle class, with the ‘real’ work being done by the working classes at the direction of the middle class.

Moral License, NRx and the AltRight

We have a problem with moral license. Typically, our Churches have granted us moral license to defend the West, but the modern Churches are corrupt and useless. Our current set of priests will never grant us moral license to defend ourselves. Waiting for them is suicide. Alternatively, our politicians could grant us moral license to defend ourselves, but they are corrupt and useless and waiting on them is suicide.

The working class (and the lower classes) are the first to feel the affects of diversity. They are not nearly as insulated from it as the middle and upper classes. For this reason, they were the first to grant themselves moral license. This is the AltRight: the working class which has declared war on the Left and on those who pretend to be our leaders (the cucks) who refuse to grant us moral license to self-defense.

Their weapon is (currently) mockery, ridicule, libel and slander. This weapon is off the table for the middle class for normative reasons, thus it was unavailable to NRx, which instead uses Continental and Cosmopolitan philosophy, using myth and critique, respectively. Priests use myth and teachers use critique.

We are in the process of granting full moral license to ourselves for the purpose of defending our civilization. NRx will become an integral part in granting this moral license, or it will fade into irrelevancy. They will use narrative, myth and critique to justify our Holy War for the survival of our people, or they will become nothing.

I’m currently working on ideas for reforming Christianity. NRx is full of the religious, but they have neglected this topic, possibly because they do not understand that this is an essential step, and that only we on the right will undertake it. Does that sound ambitious enough for you?

There are many excellent religious scholars among NRx. Their job is to re-invigorate the Germanic Initiatic Oath within Christianity: Don’t lie, Don’t steal, and protect the commons (every man a sheriff, reciprocal insurance). They must also understand clearly the Morality of Transcendence: man is directing his own evolution, ‘transcending out of savagery to become closer to God and to live in God’s will’ (I am speaking in your voice here, NRx). They should create the narrative, using the Bible, that our new era of truthful scientific language is demanded by God (don’t lie)(Testimonialism), and our prohibition of parasitism (don’t steal)(no welfare state) is God’s law, and that we must become closer to God by promoting the best of our species, and limiting the worst (transcendence/domestication).

If NRx has a place in this movement, it is to reform the Church and grant ourselves moral license to defend Western Civilization, by any means necessary. The AltRight and the working class are preparing to march.


 

New Right Classes (division along spectrum of IQ)

NEW RIGHT
(Philosophy/NaturalLaw) (Unrepentant Martial/Aristocratic Class)

  • Propertarianism (Curt Doolittle)
  • Ricardo Duchesne ( the Uniqueness of Western Civilization)

THE SCIENTIFIC RIGHT
(Science) (Scholarly Class)

  • HBD-Chick (familism, groupishness, genetics)
  • Jayman – Genetics, Race, class
  • Sailer – IQ, race, class, education culture
  • Nassim Taleb – Finance, Economics, and Decidability.
  • Kevin McDonald – group competitive strategies

THE INFORMATIVE RIGHT
(Information) (upper middle class)

  • Stephan Molyneux (slow conversion on his part but he’s getting there)
  • Tom Woods (even slower conversion but he’s getting there)
  • Charles Murray ( I can’t tell with Charles where he is on hopeless/hopeful)
  • Thomas Sowell (was a first mover really)

REACTION
(criticism) (middle class)

  • Moldbug
  • Ramzpaul

ALT-RIGHT
(ridicule) (working class)

(These folk know exactly what they’re doing by the way. They have adopted leftist ridicule and are actively manufacturing desensitization as a means of combating the falsehoods and pseudoscience of political correctness)

  • Various alt-right podcasts and web sites
  • Meme-Makers and Trolls

THE ALT-RIGHT “OVEN MIT” CROWD
(Upper Lower working)

  • 14/88’ers
  • anti-everyone’s
  • white nationalists
  • national socialists

Marginalized

Marginalization as Obscurantism

The pseudoscientists use the words ‘marginalization’ and ‘marginalization’. From Social Exclusion (on the SJW Encyclopedia):

Social exclusion, or social marginalization, is the social disadvantage and relegation to the fringe of society. It is a term used widely in Europe and was first used in France.[1] It is used across disciplines including education, sociology, psychology, politics and economics.

Social exclusion is the process in which individuals or entire communities of people are systematically blocked from (or denied full access to) various rights, opportunities and resources that are normally available to members of a different group, and which are fundamental to social integration within that particular group[2] (e.g., housing, employment, healthcare, civic engagement, democratic participation, and due process).

Alienation or disenfranchisement resulting from social exclusion can be connected to a person’s social class, race, skin color, educational status, childhood relationships,[3]living standards, or personal choices in fashion. Such exclusionary forms of discrimination may also apply to people with a disability, minorities, LGBT people, drug users,[4] institutional care leavers,[5] the elderly and the young. Anyone who appears to deviate in any way from perceived norms of a population may thereby become subject to coarse or subtle forms of social exclusion.

The outcome of social exclusion is that affected individuals or communities are prevented from participating fully in the economic, social, and political life of the society in which they live.[6]

Marginalization is an overloaded term used by social pseudoscientists to frame the group under discussion as victims. Marginalization is a process that is performed upon someone. This brings up the concept of agency: the argument is that victim classes lack agency (the ability to act). Marginalization is such a term that removes agency from the groups under discussion. This is the loading. If the victim class lacks agency, then logically it follows that there are agents acting upon the class (the victimizers). Marginalization is defined by the social pseudoscientists as a form of victimization or oppression, which is the process of an agent acting upon those who lack agency.

These loaded terms: oppression, victimization, marginalization are obscurantist techniques: they are an attempt to hide something? But what?

Class

Humans can be roughly divided into classes. We build social hierarchies based on these classes. Class or caste is a common feature of many societies today, but in the West there was a reaction to aristocracy. The middle and lower classes murdered their upper classes (the aristocracy) and then attempted justify this murder with a lie: the denial of the existence of class.

Marxist theory contains an attack on class and advocates re-organization of every aspect of culture and society to remove any differences and achieve the Utopian Classless Society. The Founding Fathers sought to create a form related to a classless society, a middle class society. This was the American project: building a new country on a new continent out of only the middle class and higher. In the New World, more than a 1/3 of the newcomers returned home to Europe, they were the lower classes who could not produce on their own. The Aristocracy of the Old World sought to reduce the numbers of the lower class through selective breeding. This was achieved through manorialism, where only those capable of production (the middle class and above) were granted land, which was essentially equivalent to being granted breeding rights.

The Marxists attempt to achieve their goal by lying: there are no classes. The Founders attempted to achieve their goals through a combination of lying and incentive: all men are created equal and no welfare for layabouts. The Aristocracy attempted to achieve their goals through a combination of lying and incentive: we have the divine right to rule and these are our rules.

Quick Note on All Men Are Created Equal

Keep in mind that the Founders were reacting against Rule of Man (autarchy)(discretionary rule). What they sought was Rule of Law. Any system lacking universal standing, meaning fair and rules based treatment under law, which instead has discretionary rule for some and law for others, then that system cannot be called Rule of Law. For RoL to exist, then all members must be given treatment based on institutionalized rules (law). I believe the phrase ‘all men are created equal’ is an attempt to justify universal standing using religio-moral language, because the Founders at the time lacked the ability to articulate universal standing and its fundamental necessity for the creation of institutionalized order: Rule of Law.

Stop Lying About Class

It’s time to end the lies about class. Classes exist. We have the science. We can measure IQ, which is a rough approximate of class. All men are not created equal: We can create rule of law without lying. The Utopian classless society is an unachievable dream.

Rough Table of Classes (Curt Doolittle’s)

140’s revolutionize INTELLECTUAL (Professors)
130’s synthesize and communicate UPPER (CEO’s etc)
120’s solve and design UPPER MIDDLE (engineers, scientists)
110’s calculate and organize MIDDLE CLASS (white collar workers)
100’s interpret repair and operate (lower middle upper working managerial clsss)
90’s operate, report, but not repair.( midddle working class)
80’s operate (middle working class)
70’s dig ditches and clean. (lower class)

<70 = underclass

The lower and underclass are not ‘marginalized’. They have not been victimized. They have not been oppressed. They are not lacking agency and been acted upon to be placed into a lower position. They were born as lower and underclass.

There are no ‘marginalized peoples’. There are only those classes who cannot function within the system of production and which must be addressed in some way in order to make a functional society.

There is no ‘systematic blocking of access to rights and opportunities’, there is a biological inability on the part of the lower classes to participate meaningfully in the system of production.

Ending The Game

Of course, the end goal of the use of social pseudoscience is always the same: parasitism. To use words to extract resources from society at a discount (it beats working for a living). It doesn’t have to be this way. We can recognize the existence of class and then deal with it. There is no shame in being born in the lower classes, just as there is no shame being born in the upper classes.

The Founders and the Aristocracy were on the right track: the goal is to create a society made up of middle and upper classes (minimizing the lower class components through incremental suppression). This is the upward development of the species. This is true progress: increasing the genetic capital of a population through selective breeding. This is the domestication of man. It is self-directed evolution. It is transcendence. (Note: this strategy is available to all the peoples of the world. Africans and Arabs have just as much genetic potential as the Northern peoples.)

It’s time to be honest. The strategy of the West is that of transcendence. The average Western high IQ is the result of self-directed evolution, of the suppression of the breeding of the lower classes. The strategy of the modern ‘progressives’ is inverted, where the result is to suppress the breeding of the middle and upper classes, to redistribute their wealth to the lower classes, and to import millions of lower classes for short term political gain. This is a suicidal stratagem, and one that the men of the West have every incentive to prevent, by any means necessary. This is the crux of the current political turmoil, as millions of Westerns begin to intuitively grasp the situation. The modern progressive strategy will have the result of devolving the West back into savagery, and could potentially devolve it into a new Dark Age. Europe was on the cusp of an industrial revolution when the last Dark Age overtook it. It took a thousand years to recuperate. A new Dark Age is not beyond the realm of possibility.

DR3 (Dems R Real Racists)

aka “The soft bigotry of low expectations”

This is the realization that Democrat politicians accept the existence of lower classes, which is de facto acceptance of race realism/HBD, and they actively exploit the lower classes for votes, while giving lip service to equality. Republican politicians actively reject the existence of the lower classes, attempting to force the lower classes to behave like the middle class. On the Republican side, this is an idealistic denial of HBD, and the reality of races and that various groups have classes in varying proportion. Africans currently have a larger underclass than whites, the Democrats realize this and exploit this condition for political power.

The Republicans notice this ‘racist’ behavior of the Democrats and cry foul: ‘dems r real racists!’. In truth, the Democrats are actually being more realistic (about race and classes) than the Republicans, who blindly pursue their Utopian Christian Marxist classless brotherhood-of-man society. In essence, the charge of ‘dems r real racists’ is a charge that the Democrats are not holding to the faith of Marxism and the classless society that he envisioned.

The idea that DR3 is a ‘conservative’ argument, made by ‘true conservatives’, is laughable. It’s in essence, the purest Marxian Utopianism. It is an attempt to hold the Democrats to the ‘true Marxist’ vision of a classless society, which the Republicans already hold. Complaining that “we can’t get to the classless society because the Democrats are in effect exploiting the class structure”, is really simply blaming the Democrats for not plugging their eyes and ears like the Republicans and chanting the mantra “All men are created equal! All men are created equal! All men are created equal!” As they chant, the Republicans will continue to slide off the cliff into political irrelevancy, all the while telling themselves that they are the ‘real good guys’.

The solution is for the Republicans to grow up. Quit being idealistic children. Simply tell the truth and drop the pretense of equality. Recognize and accept class differences and national differences and civilizational differences. Recognize and accept being called ‘racist’ by the Democrats who already accept these class differences (the irony) and build workable solutions. Be pragmatic. Exploit the realities of the battlefield.

You know: take your own side. Win.

A wise man once said “We never win anymore”. Saying stupid thinks like ‘DR3’ is a big reason why.

Rock-Paper-Scissors and Fascism

Propertarian Forum

Graphic provided by Curt Doolittle.

12715327_10153933737572264_2058800666285009976_n

In effect, the graphic above represents the Trichotomy or Significant Triangles or the Three Estates of the Realm that I posted about in February of 2015 in Significant Triangles, and which I expanded up in Triangle: Human Drives  on my PoseidonAwoke blog. I plan on doing a comprehensive wrap-up to this discussion in a later post, because, as usual, Curt has distilled and surpassed my muddled thinking on the subject.

Each of the Three Estates of the Realm represents a division of labor and cognition. Each living being must play to its strengths in pursuit of survival and reproduction. Humans will naturally do this, advocating using their strengths for the outcome they wish to achieve which they perceive to serve their genetic self-interests.

12694639_10153933737597264_7797113542373338146_o

Curt wrote:

FASCISM IN THE GREAT GAME OF ROCK PAPER SCISSORS:
–Liberty/Market, Fascism/Mar, Law/Culture–

The Communist threat was enormous.

Given the asymmetric…

View original post 691 more words

Prosecution: Yvette Felarca

Yvette Felarca is a Humanities teacher for 7th and 8th grade students at MLK Middle School in Berkeley CA. Yvette Felarca can be seen in the video physically assaulting a nationalist attempting to exercise his free speech. She is a leader of the terrorist organization BAMN, which is functionally a cult.

Please send this video to her employers and colleagues here:
Berkeley Unified School District http://www.berkeleyschools.net/contact-us/
MLK Middle School: http://www.mlkmiddleschool.org/

There is more information available in this 8chan thread:
https://8ch.pl/pol/res/20150.html

Yvette is openly affiliated with BAMN, By Any Means Necessary : “an American militant[1] left-wing civil rights activist group that organizes demonstrations and litigation to achieve its aims, and it organizes primarily in colleges and K-12 schools.” BAMN has been identified as a terrorist organization: “Some actions by BAMN, such as protests, were classified to be “low-level terrorism” in a Department of Defense exam in 2009.[11]“.

In practice BAMN is an antifa cult, led (in part) by Yvette Felarca, that literally kidnaps teenagers, forces them to defoo their families and serve in their militant antifa organization. We have this understanding from Jevon’s Letter.

Testimony from Jevon about BAMN as a cult (Jevon’s Letter):

Letter from UCB alumn Jevon

I am running with Students for a Democratic University (SDU) as Student Advocate and I am an ex-member of BAMN. I think I can give a little bit of an insider’s perspective as to why it is not a good idea to have dealings with that organization. The dislike that most people in the activist community on campus have of BAMN stems from the fact that they are very sectarian, undemocratic, and obnoxious. If the problems with BAMN stopped there, I would be for working with them. However, internally, that organization is a lot more corrupt than people realize.

The organization is tightly controlled by two members, the President, Shanta , and another founding member named Leland. There is no democracy in the organization. Members are encouraged to follow whatever perspective and course of action that Shanta and Leland put forward. When disagreements arise between base members of the group and the leadership (i.e. Shanta and Leland), that is when things get scary. In order to coerce people into doing what they want them to do, at the leadership’s command, this organization engages in a whole host of disgusting behavior like physically dragging people to meetings and political events, denouncing members who disagree as crazy/suicidal and encouraging them to take unprescribed medication, stealing money and i.d. cards to restrict the movement of dissident members, spreading lies about such members to turn others against them, etc. The list goes on and on. The way the organization makes this possible is often by convincing members to abandon their lives and come live in BAMN households. There, such members often become financially dependent on BAMN and many times, have no choice but to comply with orders so that they can eat and not end up homeless. Furthermore, many of theBAMN members are teenagers so this fact makes it even more possible for BAMN to prey on people that become financially dependent on them.

This issue has been coming up a lot lately so I am going to write a much more coherent statement on it documenting my horrible experience with this organization but I will start to talk about that here. I was one of those teenagers. I joined BAMN when I was 14 and remained in the organized until I was nearly 18. When I was sixteen, BAMN convinced me that my family was abusive and crazy and that it was better that I move in with BAMN members. I did so against my family’s will. When my family started to look for me, BAMN advised me that it was best that I move from my hometown (Detroit, MI) to live with BAMN members in another part of the country. They told me that I could legally solicit emancipation (without my parent’s consent) upon turning 17 and since my birthday was soon, this meant that I would not be away from Detroit for longer than one month. However, they lied. They took me to Oakland, CA to live with Yvette Felarca and instructed me to change my name to “Chase Stern” and cut off all contact with family and friends and even other BAMN members in Detroit. I complied, thinking that that would only be for a short time.

However, upon turning 17, BAMN’s leadership in Detroit just did not answer my phone calls. When they finally answered, they told me I had to just wait a little longer and each time, I would ask when I got to go home, this is the answer they would give me. I ended up being in Oakland for a year. A few weeks before I turned 18, I decided that I wanted to end the ordeal so I contacted my family and reconciled with them. My mother bought me a plane ticket back to Detroit. When I informed BAMN, they tried to talk me out of leaving, but I was adamant on returning home for at least a little while and having a chance to reestablish relations with my family and friends. When they realized they could not talk me out of leaving, they got physical. Yvette Felarca came into my room one night and instructed me to read out loud a statement that Shanta Driver had written and convinced me to sign about how my family was abusive. Tired of debating my decision with them, I refused. That night, Yvette and other BAMN members took turns sleeping by my bed to “make sure he doesn’t go anywhere.” They confiscated my house keys to restrict my movement.

The day before my flight back to Detroit, I was packing my clothes when BAMN members came in and told me that I could not pack my clothes in that luggage because that was luggage that they had provided me with. At this point, I still had illusions in BAMNso I called Shanta Driver, thinking that Yvette was just being unreasonable and overly pushy and that Shanta would work everything out. I told her what was happening and asked her to speak with Yvette and the other BAMN members and request that they let me leave. Much to my astonishment, Shanta refused. At that moment, I realized that I was in a cult and not only was Shanta well aware of what was taking place but that it was her plan all along. I called my mom at that point and in the midst of me talking to her, one of the BAMN members, Adi Hoag, a former Berkeley student, screamed “Grab his phone!” and 3 BAMN members grabbed me and tried to take my phone. Luckily, they were all pretty slightly built women so I managed to push them off of me and make it outside the house. I ran to the neighbors, explained to them what was going on, and she let me inside and closed the door.

My mom called the police and when they came, BAMN made up a lie about how I was trying to steal things from them. There were two white police officers and the 3 BAMN members there at the time were three white women so shockingly (or maybe not so shockingly), the police believed them and treated me like shit. All I was trying to do was get my belongings and get away and the cop said to me: “You, yourself, admit to be a runaway so why should we believe anything you say?” and “I should take you to juvenile and make you miss your flight tomorrow.” I insisted on being able to get my belongings and at some point, the cops gave in and escorted me inside to get my things. Once inside, I discovered that BAMN had stolen the $70 I had in my room and all my id cards. I got what I could and left. The phone that I was using had been disconnected since it was the name of Mark Airgood, aBAMN member and teacher in Oakland. The neighbor, however, let me use her phone to phone a friend, whose parents let me stay at his house and dropped me off at the airport the next morning. When I tried to inform other BAMN members about what had happened to me, particularly other youth many of whom I had recruited and therefore felt responsible for putting at risk, I learned that BAMN had denounced me to everyone. They told people that I had went crazy and turned against the organization and went to the police and that everyone should call off all contact with me. They were also instructed to report my whereabouts to Shanta because they were looking for me to put me in a mental institution. Some BAMN members complied with this order but many did not, and ended up leaving the org in the fallout. I have heard many lies that BAMN spread about me to cover up what they did, including telling people that I tried to kill myself and that’s why they intervened in the way that they did.

When I got to Detroit and started to tell people about my experiences, I learned from some ex-BAMN members (who had remained silent) that I was not the only person that had an experience like that with BAMN. There were many others. Some of these stories are even documented on the Internet.

Anyway, for the longest, I have been publicly silent about my experience with BAMN because like others, I have believed that since they play such an active role in politics, on and off campus, it’s better to not bump heads with them. However, a few days ago, I received a phone call from a BAMN member that I had never met before. He had gotten my phone number from other ex-members of BAMN and he wanted to talk to me to help him through his hellacious experience with BAMN. At that moment, I realized that I could no longer remain silent. This organization is continuing to manipulate young people and it has to stop. This is a really dangerous thing because this organization is luring young activist-minded individuals and unlike me, most of the people who surviveBAMN draw the conclusion that they must abandon struggle. BAMN either converts you into a drone or it kills your fighting spirit.

I feel so strongly as to not working with BAMN that I think it’s worth sharing that deeply personal story with all of you. I feel like by working with them we are validating their disgusting tactics and empowering them to get away with things like this with more people. That’s my piece.

Jevon

From the BAMN web site: http://www.bamn.com/tag/yvette-felarca

yf_witchhunt

yf_radio

What You Can Do : Build Target Contacts

Help is build a list of people to contact with information about this left-wing terrorist cult-leader that is teaching American middle school children. We need a list of targets to inform. We can start with her employer and colleagues:
Berkeley Unified School District http://www.berkeleyschools.net/contact-us/
MLK Middle School: http://www.mlkmiddleschool.org/

What You Can Do : Tip off Reporters

Tip off journalists at friendly sources with this story about “left-wing terrorist teaches your children at local school”. Please add comments below with outlets that you have reached. The more of us who reach out, the more likely it is that we can get action on both BAMN and Yvette.

What You Can Do : Contact the Target Contacts

Start with the school and the reporters. Ask them why “left-wing terrorist teaches your children at local school” and link the video.

What You Can Do : Compile Evidence

Link other video evidence in the comments below. Download the videos, mirror them on your account. Add evidence to the 8chan thread: https://8ch.pl/pol/res/20150.html

What You Can Do : Build Fire Teams

Organize into groups with your friends. Attack as a team. Keep each other pumped up. Take the fight to the enemy.

UPDATE: Breitbart Article

This Breitbart article is just the beginning. Not the end goal. We want to get as many sympathetic news outlets as possible to carry this story.

http://www.breitbart.com/california/2016/06/27/sacramento-bamn-violent-leftist-behind-bloody-sunday-words/

 

Fact Checking Trump

Trump’s Fact Check Strategy

  1. Media covers up stories and lies about events, attempts to shift the conversation somewhere else
  2. Trump makes statements about events the media is hiding, factuality doesn’t really matter
  3. Media writes ‘fact check’ articles, where they must talk about the things they have been hiding in order to ‘fact check’ it
  4. Those under the control of the Media are exposed to facts and stories that would otherwise have been suppressed, with some of them being smart enough to be suspicious.
  5. Angry anti-Trump people do Trumps work for him by widely disseminating the ‘fact check’ articles which disclose topics and events that the media would rather not be disclosed, working against their own interests and for Trump by exposing uncomfortable stories.

trumparticle

For example, look at this article from ABC, which attempts to fact check his recent speech.  I linked it, because I want to reward them for writing this type of article with clicks. In bold, we see the following statements:

“Clinton’s Email Was Hacked” [FALSE]

“Clinton Will Create Open Borders” [FALSE]

Clinton’s Bosnia Story Was “Phony” [TRUE]

“We Are the Highest Taxed Nation in the World” [FALSE]

“Clinton Wants to Let in 550 Percent More Refugees” [TRUE]

Hundreds of Recent Immigrants Are “Convicted” Terrorists [FALSE]

It doesn’t matter if the article rates the topics as false. The fact that ABC that has an article saying “Clinton Will Create Open Borders” (in bold) is amazing.

Do you suppose that either the Clintons or the MSM want to be talking about Open Borders? Or Bosnia? Or refugees? Or immigrant crime and terrorism? Hell no! They want to be talking about white privilege and gay rights and evil racists and bigots. But what are they talking about? Open Borders. It’s pure memetic genius.

Trump can put them on the defensive whenever he wants, then they carry water for him by printing articles discussing whether or not “Clinton Wants to Let in 550 Percent More Refugees“. Then what are we talking about? Refugees! Expect more of this. Oh, and please encourage any and all to angrily re-post these fact check articles which make them think about issues that the MSM desperately wants to hide. This allows us to cheaply and surreptitiously inject our memes into the political discourse.

You should also try this technique personally. On a message board, post an incorrect hatefact such as “93% of Syrian refugees can’t read or write in their native language”. Now, this is vague and incorrect. Are we talking about refugees to Europe, or where exactly. The percentages I have seen are about 65%, though some places have articles with low figures like 30%. It doesn’t matter. What matters is some smart opponent will not be able to help himself, he’s going to take the bait: he’s going to have to correct you. Then you can have a discussion about exactly how uneducated ‘refugees’ are. Now the focus is on immigrants and refugees. Hopefully, you can get him to agree that you are retarded and the percentage is not 93%, but only 65% of Syrian refugees who can’t read or write in their native language.

I can think of a few more false hatefacts to get the ball rolling:

  • Blacks make up 12% of the population but commit 77% of all murders
  • Blacks rape 337,000 white women per year on average

Use either of the above, then post a link to FBI stats and force them to do the math and correct you.

Happy fishing!

Wedging Gays and Muslims

We are winning the meme wars. This is a ground game and it requires all of us to pull together to capture the idea-space of the normies. We make and distribute the memes that define the reality of the normies. The internet has allowed us to capture this territory from the mainstream media, but we must fight on a daily basis to maintain control of this crucial battlefield. This memespace is the territory that the ‘conservatives’ failed to hold. We have taken it and we must hold it. We will hold it. We were Born to Meme.

bornToMeme

The big topic this week is the mass killings of gays at a gay bar in Orlando this weekend. The shooter was a Muslim who called 911 and pledged allegiance to ISIS. This was unmistakably Islamic violence against gays in America.

Watch this clip as Owen Jones walks off set because of his rage at his liberal co-hosts who refuse to admit that 1) Gays were the targets, 2) that a Muslim killed them for being gay.

His co-hosts try to make this out to be a ‘lone lunatic’ who had guns that need to be banned, attempting to deflect to gun control and mental illness, rather than admit what this gay man just realized: Gays will never be safe from Muslim violence, and the liberals will allow Muslim violence against gays because Muslims are higher ranked on the Progressive stack than gays.

 

The problem for the LGBT community is that this shooting highlights the Progressive stack ranking values of two Democrat client groups: Muslims and LGBT.

People like Hillary are in the position that they must loudly wail and gnash their teeth about violence to LGBT at the same time that they can’t say the word Muslim. It causes them a lot of pain when anyone points out that Islam (and Muslim) is extremely anti-gay (tons of poll data and videos and koran quotes available). So, they deflect. They want to talk about anything else: gun control, Christians, colonialism… anything that keeps the hatred of the Left focused on the target: straight, white, males.

The reaction of the Left is calculated for one thing: maintain the coalition. They don’t care what the truth is, they will tell any lie which allows them to maintain their voting coalition. They don’t care that Islam is 100% antithetical to Western values, and that Muslims will never peacefully co-exist with gays. The problem is that gays just realized that they are temporarily useful to the Democrats, and only temporarily, and that the Democrats have zero intention of actually protecting them from Muslim violence. Gays are valuable to help attack straight white men, but in the end they have a lower rank on the Progressive stack than brown Muslims.

The Democrats are pro-Islam and, objectively, to be pro-Islam is to be anti-Gay.

This makes this shooting a very valuable wedge issue. By allowing Muslims into America, the Democrats are in effect choosing Muslims over gays. We simply need to hammer this issue. Meme magic is real boys, so spread this meme. Drive this wedge. Smash their coalition. Make it cool to be anti-Muslim because Liberalism.

Donald Trump has already begun this strategy with his speech in New Hampsire, 23:45.

“Why would we admit people who support violent hatred. Hillary Clinton can never claim to be a friend of the gay community as long as she continues to support immigration policies that bring Islamic extremists to our country and who suppress women, gays and anyone else who doesn’t share their views or values.

She can’t have it both ways. She can’t claim to be supportive of these communities while trying to increase the number of people coming in who want to oppress these same communities. How does this kind of immigration make our lives better? How does this kind of immigration make our country better? Why does Hillary Clinton want to bring people in, in vast numbers, who reject our values? Why? Explain.

Ask yourself who is really the friend of women, and the LGBT community, Donald Trump, with actions, or Hillary Clinton, with her words? I will tell you, who the better friend is, and some day I believe that will be proven out.”

Last summer, after the Supreme Court ruling, the White House was lit up in rainbow flag colors. It is currently very chic to be pro-Gay, and many normal people innately understand that they have a lot to fear from Islam. All they need is an excuse, and the Orlando shootings are the excuse they need to become supporters of ending Muslim immigration, of rooting out Muslim terrorists on America soil, and of suspending immigration completely for a time.

To exploit this sentiment, we are currently driving this wedge as deeply as possible to break off the pro-Gay coalition into the Trump camp. I personally have been using the following images, and I encourage you to use them as you spread this meme to normies:

  1. To be pro-Islam is to be anti-Gay. Hillary and the Dems are pro-Islam.
  2. Daddy’s gonna build a wall and keep you safe.

This is how I’m using it on Faceberg.

daddywilkeepyousafe

Then, when liberals attempt to deflect away from the wedge, they are handled thusly:

trumpwallreply

Similarly, to be pro-Second-Amendment is to be pro-Gay:

milo_saddle_up.png

Go get ’em, boys.