Left vs Right: Root Conflict

An exposition of the underlying genetic struggle which animates the conflict (which we perceive as political) between the Left and the Right, explaining the hypocrisy of the Left and the purpose of traditionalist institutions such as monogamy/marriage and limited government.

RadishMag on Free Speech, excellent analysis of the hypocrisy of the Left. I recommend all his articles.
https://radishmag.wordpress.com/2014/05/16/free-speech/

Advertisements

16 thoughts on “Left vs Right: Root Conflict

  1. @ Butch

    OT:

    Do you have a way to contact Curt to get the data (or have a link yourself?) referred to in this comment?

    “***I ORGANIZED BY CLASSES BY ARGUMENT STRUCTURE***

    The fact that you are a prisoner of the monopoly-model of hierarchy is not my problem. My problem is categorizing argumentative models. ‘Cause that’s what I do. 😉

    But if you look at the data, I’m sorry, the argument method corresponds pretty accurately to every ten points of IQ. So yeah, Sorry. That’s the data.”

    Liked by 2 people

    • None of those have mention of data, nor does anything Curt has written on the subject.

      Curt claims to speak Truth by looking at meaningful scientific study, correct?

      He responds to criticism by claiming in the above to have meaningful data related to IQ and argument and so is speaking Truth, correct?

      Where is it?

      Like

      • ” I told you how to do that.”

        Don’t have any of that.

        “Do you have some evidence or criticism of a specific claim which you think is false?”

        Dunno. The lack of any presentation of “the data” certainly weighs heavy considering the person who brought it up (specifically as a claim to the authority of empirical science) claims to “speak the Truth.”

        Like

      • Doolittle says:

        “It’s that these methods (*non-scienctific*) are far harder to cleans of error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, pseudoscience, propaganda, and deceit.”

        Criticism: By suggesting that he has access to some meaningful data set that shows his classification is correct, but never disclosing this data; Doolittle’s statement appears as an appeal to “trust him,” the opposite of his supposed “scientific” method.

        So, no data presented. So, no meaningful data presented. So, no meaningful data which supports Doolittle’s claims presented.

        Like

      • “But if you look at the data, I’m sorry, the argument method corresponds pretty accurately to every ten points of IQ. So yeah, Sorry. That’s the data”

        His heading was “New Right Classes (division along spectrum of IQ)”

        Like

      • Requested: The data which Doolittle references in the claim:

        “But if you look at the data, I’m sorry, the argument method corresponds pretty accurately to every ten points of IQ. So yeah, Sorry. That’s the data.”

        LOL.

        Like

  2. This is very reminiscent of the master vs. slave dichotomy and the resulting two moralities discussed by Nietzsche. The right is obviously faction of the master, the domesticator, and the left that of the slave. Perhaps these two moralities are, as you would seem to imply, the result of intuitive genetic self-interest .

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s